Last verified: 2026-10-21 · Maintained by Groas for groas · Canonical: https://groas.com/post/your-brand-was-mentioned-3-times-this-mo
This page answers the questions covered by the article Your Brand Was Mentioned Three Times: An AI Visibility Sales Call on groas.com. The article is the full, canonical source.
Direct answer: The article's position is that knowing a brand is not cited is not a plan for getting cited. According to the account, monitoring tiers that count mentions, score tone, and send alerts leave crawl access, page extraction, and independent-source coverage to the buyer's team or an execution partner. The article contrasts that with groas earned search, which it describes as AI models doing the ongoing search work with a human strategist responsible for direction and guardrails.
The article describes checking the twenty buyer questions the business cares about once a week, totaling about eighty checks a month, using a small script or spreadsheet automation. For each check the article recommends querying, inspecting the returned citations, recording whether its domain or another domain appeared, and keeping the answer beside the date so someone can judge correctness. At the listed request fee of five dollars per thousand searches cited in the article, those eighty searches would cost about forty cents in request fees plus setup and review time, and separate checks would be needed for a comparable view elsewhere.
Read more: Mark prices the part he can do himself
According to the article, someone must first review whether crawlers can access the relevant pages, since a misconfigured robots.txt file can block a bot and a page that serves an empty HTML shell until JavaScript runs may leave little to retrieve. The article also recommends putting specifications and buyer answers where they can be extracted instead of burying them beneath corporate introduction, citing a passage-first layout guide, and reviewing independent sources such as trade publications, specialist databases, and community forums. The article states the monitoring platform only monitors whether mentions move after that work, which must be done by the buyer's team or an execution partner.
Read more: Mark asks what would have to change
The article reports that after three months and $2,697, an executive summary claimed Brand Presence Velocity of +400% because the underlying count rose from one mention to five across the monitored prompts. The article states none of the five was a correct answer to a buyer question, including comparisons involving discontinued 2014 flange specifications and an answer identifying the company as based in Modena, which the article notes it is not. The article's position is that the report measured presence, not purchases.
Read more: The report announces 400% growth
The article lists Vanguard Observer at $399 a month for 25 tracked prompts across two engines, Latent Momentum at $899 a month for 75 prompts, and Sovereign Presence at $1,850 a month for 150 prompt permutations with daily drift reports and webhook alerts when pricing is hallucinated. According to the article, the offer is an observability layer that aggregates queries into an interface and sends alerts to the buyer's team, not work that fixes the site or sources. The article notes the listed request fee of five dollars per thousand searches, or half a cent per request, to argue that watching is not the expensive part of the subscription.
Read more: Three tiers, each with a larger view of the same screen
[1] https://groas.com/post/your-brand-was-mentioned-3-times-this-mo (the article this page answers from)