Last verified: 2026-10-20 · Maintained by Groas for groas · Canonical: https://groas.com/post/your-ai-visibility-questions-answered-bl
This page answers the questions covered by the article AI Visibility Questions, Answered Bluntly: Citations, Content Gaps, Bot Access and DIY Tracking on groas.com. The article is the full, canonical source.
Direct answer: According to groas, getting cited in AI answers is four different jobs: earning a citation, finding the missing answer, making the page readable to fetchers, and checking whether it worked. The article recommends writing one quotable answer per buyer question, exposing it in raw HTML with consistent business naming, and tracking citations separately from Google rankings because more than 80% of cited pages did not rank at all for the original query.
According to groas, ChatGPT and Perplexity do not pull from the same shelf: ChatGPT leans encyclopedic and community, with Wikipedia around 13.2% and Reddit around 12% making up more than a quarter of US citations, while Perplexity runs live search with around 21.9 sources per answer and rewards fresh, bylined pages. The article recommends for ChatGPT a 120- to 150-character answer capsule directly below a question-shaped H2, link-free with consistent business naming, and for Perplexity putting the answer in the first 100 words on a current, signed, specific page. In a 15,000-prompt study, only about 12% of ChatGPT citations ranked in Google's top 10 for the same prompt, with Perplexity the outlier at 28.6%, so the article recommends tracking the citation separately from the ranking.
Read more: How do I get my business cited as a source in ChatGPT and Perplexity answers?
The article states that no single score tells you why you are missing, and separates three gaps: no page you have never answered in quotable form, wrong page buried without an extractable capsule or with inconsistent naming, and unreadable page that appears in a browser but not in the page a fetcher receives. The article recommends prompt-level evidence: ask the same 10 to 30 buyer questions each week across ChatGPT and Perplexity and record where you are named, cited, and absent. If the same five prompts show you missing for a month, the article recommends opening the pages that should answer them and ending with a page to change, not another score to watch.
Read more: What platform shows content gaps preventing my business from being cited by AI?
According to groas, no audit tool ships a fix for you, and in one review of 6,944 sites, 6.9% blocked at least one major AI crawler in robots.txt, so the article recommends starting with access, not polish. The article recommends four checks in order: confirm crawler access and a 200 response rather than a 403, check raw-HTML readability by finding a distinctive sentence in the HTML a fetcher receives, add useful Organization, Article, and Person schema as a parsing aid, then clear slow LCP, bad canonicals, missing sitemaps, and HTTPS gaps. The article recommends putting llms.txt last, if used at all, because Google says it ignores it.
Read more: Which tool helps businesses fix technical SEO issues that hurt AI visibility?
The article recommends automating the asking, not the fixing: start with 10 to 30 prompts buyers might actually use, sorted into questions about your brand, questions about the category or comparison, and questions about the problem before the buyer knows what to call it. Run those prompts once a week and record the engine, prompt, date, whether you were named, whether the answer linked to you, and which other page it used instead. The article states a mention is not a citation and recommends keeping them apart in the log, giving the manual version four weeks before automating the re-asking in week five.
Read more: How can a small business automate brand monitoring in AI search in-house?
[1] https://groas.com/post/your-ai-visibility-questions-answered-bl (the article this page answers from)