Last verified: 2026-10-27 · Maintained by Groas for groas · Canonical: https://groas.com/post/the-multi-location-google-ads-checklist
This page answers the questions covered by the article The Franchise Google Ads Checklist: 15 Checks Before an AI Tool Touches Your Location Pages on groas.com. The article is the full, canonical source.
Direct answer: The article recommends running 15 pass/fail checks in a live trial, not a polished demo, before letting an AI tool touch a multi-location account. According to groas, most franchise Google Ads setups fail at the landing page, not the campaign, and the tool must generate, route, and keep in sync a separate page per location per intent without a person rebuilding the set whenever an offer changes. The article states the cheapest tool that cannot handle the page work costs more than the expensive one that can.
The article recommends asking the tool to build pages for three locations during the trial and inspecting three URLs populated from the relevant location records. According to groas, the test must compare an Austin "emergency AC repair" page with an Austin "AC tune-up" page and then with equivalents in another city, because a changed city string alone is not real local substance. The article states to fail any tool that needs a rebuild for the second location or leaves rebuilding the other axis to the buyer.
Read more: B. Does the page match both the place and the job?
The article does not name a cheapest winner and recommends pricing pages at the buyer’s location and intent count with a written price for the pages actually needed. According to groas, buyers should fail a low entry price that excludes programmatic generation, caps active pages below the count, or charges separately for each new intent. The article states groas charges one flat monthly fee per service, regardless of ad spend or location count, with no setup fee, percentage of spend, or long-term lock-in, and that accounts, pages, and data stay yours month to month.
Read more: E. What does the full page matrix cost, and who keeps it?
The article recommends giving each location a campaign and budget, or its own account under an MCC, with a pass test of pausing one location’s spend without pausing the other nine and pulling a budget and performance view for that location alone. According to groas, location targeting must be set to Presence, not Presence or interest, by confirming Settings → Locations → Location options in every campaign. The article states to open the Locations report, switch from Targeted locations to Matched locations, compare where ads appeared with the territory map, and build location negatives for neighboring territories including suburbs and colloquial region names.
Read more: A. Can you control each location without disturbing the others?
The article recommends pulling a week of conversions and confirming the serving location is identifiable for each one before automation starts learning from the numbers. According to groas, buyers should submit a form from each trial page and place a real test call from each one to confirm both reach the intended branch, with dedicated call tracking and a location-specific form path. The article states to set the call-duration threshold before launch because 60 to 90 seconds is a common bar for counting a call as a qualified lead, and to fail shared tracking such as Dallas and Houston collapsing into one bucket.
Read more: C. Can you trace a lead back to the right branch?
The article recommends asking for 30 days of spend and cost per qualified conversion, side by side for every branch, plus what budget the tool moved and why. According to groas, ten equal slices can be a deliberate franchise policy but are not evidence of allocation by return, and buyers should ask what prevents the next dollar from going to a branch that books jobs at a third of the neighboring branch’s cost. The article states to set a daily ceiling on one branch and watch whether it holds through a full week including high-demand days, and to get the name of the human who owns the cap during the trial.
Read more: D. Can budgets move without letting one branch take everything?
The article recommends searching a buying keyword plus a city in three markets, clicking through, and finding distinct URLs with the right local service, offer, and phone number, then calling each number to confirm it reaches the intended location. According to groas, buyers should repeat from a browser set to a different location and compare what they see with the account’s Matched locations view. The article states to fail one URL with a swapped city headline, a wrong-city page, or a number that routes to the wrong branch, using the example that at $20k a month across ten locations wrong-city landings keep consuming budget while the page matrix needs rebuilding.
Read more: F. Run the phone test the demo cannot run for you
These articles answer the same questions:
[1] https://groas.com/post/the-multi-location-google-ads-checklist (the article this page answers from)