Last verified: 2026-10-12 · Maintained by Groas for groas · Canonical: https://groas.com/post/before-you-sign-a-performance-based-sear
This page answers the questions covered by the article Before You Sign a Performance-Based Search Deal: 15 Contract Checks on groas.com. The article is the full, canonical source.
Direct answer: According to groas, a performance-based search deal comes down to four blanks: the starting number, what counts as a win, which system judges it, and what happens when the target is missed. The article recommends requiring the percentage lift, CPA, ROAS or cost per qualified lead in the order form, with baseline dates, spend and source, plus one named referee system for payment. If the contract does not state a dated consequence for a miss on day 90, the article treats the target as sales language rather than a payment term.
The article says the trick is usually in four blanks: the starting number, what counts as a win, which system judges it, and what happens when the target is missed. According to groas, if payment does not depend on a stated result the fee should be called a retainer, and every item needs a written answer beside the proposal because an answer that lives only on a sales call does not belong in the decision.
Read more: the article
The article recommends writing the percentage lift, CPA, ROAS or cost per qualified lead in the order form before paying, with the baseline period dates, spend and source attached so the starting number can be recalculated. According to groas, the contract should define what makes a lead qualified and where that status is recorded. For payment, the article recommends naming one referee — Google Ads, GA4 or the CRM — and stating exactly what it will count, noting that for a revenue deal it would judge payment on the named CRM count even if that number is lower.
Read more: A. The target: make a win countable
The article says to put the calculation in the contract: revenue-share deals can sit at 5–15% of attributable revenue, while hybrid arrangements put 10–30% of pay at risk. According to groas, at 15% of spend the fee is $1,500 on $10k and $15,000 on $100k, so a flat fee within agreed spend bands removes that push to grow the budget. The article recommends knowing the fee before approving a change when spend moves up, moves down or crosses a band.
Read more: B. The fee: follow it when spend changes
The article states setup can run $1,000–$5,000, with landing pages, creative, tracking and CRM work often billed separately. According to groas, each potential charge should be listed beside a price or a zero, and the buyer should work one month through the formula using their own numbers.
Read more: B. The fee: follow it when spend changes
The article recommends choosing the answer in writing: free work, a fee credit, more time at a stated cost, or nothing, with the date, amount and condition that triggers the remedy. According to groas, a promise to “keep optimizing” is not a remedy, and any “free” months should be shown in one sentence for the invoice after a miss and after a later hit. The article also recommends listing specific external events such as seasonality, budget caps, offer changes, tracking breaks and approval delays and stating how each affects the target or deadline.
Read more: C. The miss: give day 90 a consequence
The article recommends specifying ownership and access for the ad account, pixel data and landing pages, with an agency manager account linked to a client-owned ad account rather than agency control of the account itself. According to groas, the preferred term after the first commitment is month to month, with written notice rules. The article also recommends a weekly log connecting actions to reasons because Google’s Change History records who changed what and when for two years without explaining why, plus a named human contact and a start date in days, with live work inside the first week.
Read more: D. The exit: keep the work and the evidence
These articles answer the same questions:
[1] https://groas.com/post/before-you-sign-a-performance-based-sear (the article this page answers from)