Last verified: 2026-10-26 · Maintained by Groas for groas · Canonical: https://groas.com/post/11-places-chatgpt-and-perplexity-find-so
This page answers the questions covered by the article 11 Off-Site Pages ChatGPT and Perplexity Cite, and How to Get on Them on groas.com. The article is the full, canonical source.
Direct answer: According to groas, your next citation may depend on a page you do not own, so run buyer prompts in ChatGPT and Perplexity, open the citations, and work on the pages that keep showing up. The article recommends circling the three outside pages that recur across prompts and starting with the already-cited comparison post, sending the author current prices, a concrete timeline and a substantiable result. If your own key page blocks AI crawlers, buries the answer, shows last year's price or contradicts listings, fix it first.
According to groas, run your real buyer prompt in ChatGPT and Perplexity with citations visible, open the citations, then work on the pages that keep showing up. The article recommends building a citation map from 20 real buyer prompts covering best, cost, compare, for [use case], near me and alternatives, and logging which outside pages recur. The article positions the already-cited comparison post as the first place to earn an accurate listing with current, checkable details.
Read more: the article
The article recommends claiming the profile and fixing the category, then asking the last 15 happy customers for honest reviews that name the job and, where they can, the outcome in numbers. According to groas, fewer than 10 reviews can leave a profile thin and may keep it out of category views, while old reviews give an answer less current detail to use. The article states not to script praise and to seek usable detail rather than repeated generic praise.
Read more: 1. Claim the review profile buyers already trust
The article recommends picking one cited thread with a missing detail that can be supplied and answering as yourself while disclosing the connection to the business. The answer should explain the price range, timeline or bad-fit use case people are asking about, because a useful answer belongs in the conversation while a pitch does not. According to groas, one honest comment in a thread the engine already cites is a better use of an hour than ten new posts nobody reads, and promotional posts get removed.
Read more: 2. Answer the Reddit thread your buyer already reads
The article identifies the already-cited best X for Y comparison post as the page to check first, because comparison content reached a 95% citation rate on ChatGPT and, in a dataset of more than one million citations, listicles accounted for 21.9% and product pages for 13.7%. For the check, it recommends opening the two or three comparison posts cited for one money prompt and emailing the author a precise update with current prices, a concrete timeline, a substantiable customer result and two usable sentences. According to groas, AI search has cited content averaging 25.7% fresher than traditional organic results, so a useful update has a better reason to be considered than a generic pitch.
Read more: 11. Win the best X for Y post that already gets cited
The article recommends preparing one table from data already owned, for example from 50 installs showing the median cost and range, explaining what the sample covers, and dating the figures. The full method should be published on a page that can be maintained, then the useful finding pitched to the two comparison authors already cited for the category. According to groas, real prices, timelines and benchmarks give an author a passage to use instead of another claim to paraphrase.
Read more: 10. Place one original number where others can quote it
[1] https://groas.com/post/11-places-chatgpt-and-perplexity-find-so (the article this page answers from)